Well, that was a bit of a pause. My pencil broke.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Over the past six months, I\u2019ve spent a fair bit of time splitting wood. It\u2019s an amazingly satisfying process. You start out with a haphazard mound of logs, relatively disordered and occupying part of the driveway, and you end up with a lot of lovely burnable pieces, stacked neatly in one of the bays of the woodshed. It\u2019s all about bringing order and control to the chaos and entropy of nature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Of course there are other things involved. In my case, my parents battered little pickup truck, which is always fun to rattle around the island. Also, an electric splitter and some comfortable work gloves, one or two hard-working chucks (which sit between the splitter\u2019s ram and the log being cleaved), and the miasma of freshly applied sunblock. A user\u2019s manual, dipstick, oil pan, fresh quart, and telephone call to RYOBI technical support (in Alabama, it sounded like). An extension cord, water breaks, a couple of handmade saw horses with a plank across them, a marvellously maneuverable wheelbarrow, and a father who periodically helps direct, split, or stack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Most of all\u2014and the key feature of what makes splitting wood so satisfying\u2014there is much very immediate feedback. Aside from the visual feedback of the mound-to-woodshed transition (a wonderful net effect), each log continually communicates what is happening throughout the splitting process. It tells you what is happening; it tells you what to do next. Fir logs tell you they have great transverse knots in them when they make the splitter grind and grouse and ultimately stop the ram from hydraulically moving forward. Or, alternately, they tell you about grain and lignin and angles when they sweetly sandwich apart, tumbling gently into your gloved hands like a newborn. An alder log brags to you about its species\u2019 indefatigability when you pick it up from the pile it has been sitting in for a week or so, showing new green shoots popping up from where smaller branches were removed during bucking up. It has already become a nurse log. Arbutus logs trumpet their magnificent structural intensity and locked-in energies when they bang!<\/em> apart into two twisty halves, jumping off the splitter rail and trying to take your eyeball out of its socket. Even better, they tell you how much the fleshy fiber of a log has in common wiht the meaty tissues of a leg of lamb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The relationship between splitter (human), splitter (mechanical), and splittee (woodish) is one of constant and cyclical feedback. It is wonderful. It feels good, trusting, meaningful. It is what happens when you learn to listen differently and recognize how much you are being told. It tells you things about yourself, too, and all the things around you. It is peaceful and productive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Afterwards, there is the wood. There is the human, too, with some residual aches in his muscles and quiet pleasure in his mind. His heart is calm, restful. His wrists, unused to bearing clumsy weights at odd angles, are a little creaky. He has a bruise just above his right hip, where he rested too many over-large logs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Feedback is fantastically important. Feedback\u2014in all its many forms\u2014makes us feel connected, witnessed, aware, sensitive, valued. Perhaps most importantly, it tells us how to keep moving forward, or whether to change direction, shift our footing, increase momentum, or slow down. Sometimes feedback suggests that we stop and remain still. All around us, the systems of the world give us feedback\u2014mostly\u2014so that we don\u2019t become paralyzed with unknowing or damage ourselves and those around us. Really well designed things\u2014building tools, websites, kitchen appliances, clothing\u2014give us feedback as we interact with them. The people who designed them know this is important for us to keep using them; it\u2019s just good sense if you want someone to engage with what you have made.<\/p>\n\n\n\n All sorts of things have feedback built into them, often without our being totally aware of it, and it allows for fluid movement, trust, and success in our endeavours. Cakes in an oven send out smells and change color, telling us: Put on those mitts and get ready to test me.<\/em> An approaching pedestrian glances up and adjusts her trajectory, saying, No body check for you today, mister!<\/em> (Or does the opposite, given our days of phones and earbuds…) A dog on his leash tugs back as you mindlessly meander onwards, implying: No, but really! the last one! who peed here? was really REALLY interesting! you gotta come over here! and smell this! <\/em>A weirdly inappropriate photo appears on screen, confirming: You clickbait dupe, you.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n And then, more and more frequently, there are those things that don\u2019t come with feedback.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Over those same six months of very satisfying wood splitting, I have also, unsatisfyingly, been getting a lot of rejection letters in response to job applications. It was rejection season, after all. I have also gotten a lot of silence\u2014a kind of non-response. As is becoming more and more common, no-thanks letters contain very little in the way of feedback. Nothing particularly personal or relevant to what I said in my materials\u2014cover letters, CVs, research synopses, teaching philosophies, art documentation. Nothing particularly relevant about the interview process I was not admitted to. Nothing that might promote questions about equality or employment practices. Nothing that might be actionable if fairness is not perceived. Nothing much at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A series of relatively identically worded rejections for part-time teaching jobs at one institution were intriguing (mildly) because of the extraordinary lack of care with which they were printed. One version came from a department chair who, ordinarily, attends carefully to many normative conventions of power and institutions that produce inequity in the world. In this case, the ten-point typeface occupied the upper fifth of the form letter, and the photocopied signature hovered a bit lower. The whole thing was a bit askew on the page. It told me that hiring decisions are based on seniority, per the part-time faculty agreement. (Why bother using grammar in one\u2019s application materials, then?) Much the same wording appeared on a PDF version that was emailed to me from another department. The body of the email text said something to the effect of: Please see the attached PDF for the hiring response from the part-time hiring committee.<\/em> A negative response, of course, and oddly evasive. More inattentive still, the email sender (the department assistant) had closed with the salutation, \u201cCheers!\u201d, followed by her email signature. Um… sorry, but that\u2019s just rude. Yay, you didn\u2019t get the position\u2014rock on, loser!<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Yes, I\u2019m kind of sour and annoyed these days, because it gets hard to be turned down over and over. We applicants spend hours and hours of time to write thoughtful letters and teaching philosophy statements\u2014not to mention a fair wad of cash to print out color copies of our art documentation (yep, paper-based and posted job applications, in 2017!)<\/em> And the response in an emailed pffftt!<\/em> or an ill-designed and badly printed form letter in the mailbox.<\/p>\n\n\n\n But beyond the mundanity of rejections, my greater sadness is how much this process has made me sensitive to the incredible lack of attention and feedback that we seem to be giving each other these days, whether in job applications or dating apps, text messages or published texts. Are we really so terribly busy? Do we really not care about the effects of this inattention? Does meaningful feedback open us up to vulnerability? Maybe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A side effect, it seems to me, is that not getting (or giving) feedback might be breeding less and less desire to initiate<\/em> a communicative act with any real stakes. We woof and ping on Scruff and Tinder, rather than saying I like your hair style<\/u> and profile comment about going to the barber shop. <\/em>We tap out emojis and ???s on WhatsApp and page proofs, rather than using our fucking words and getting messy with our feelings. Occasionally, the world does respond to an action or a tweet, and for whatever set of reasons, an effort gets massive feedback, though often it might not be so warranted. But to the majority of our day-to-day attempts… crickets. And then the sound of blood pounding in our ears, the neighbor\u2019s air conditioner inexorably kicking on, and the cold whisper of creeping despondency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n